Where Are All the iOS Magazine Subscription Apps?
I bought the initial Wired edition for $4.99 but I'm not buying the second one. Over the weekend I realized I played around a bit with the Wired iPad edition but never finished reading it. In fact, I'm more likely to read the print copy that's sitting on my desk than the iPad version. And since I get the print version for $10/year, why in the world would I even think about paying $4.99 per iPad issue?
I'm certainly not the first to blog about this and I doubt I'll be the last. What I can't understand though is why, after Apple made in-app subscriptions possible months ago, are none of the big guys selling their magazines that way?
Does it have to do with Apple's 30% cut? Are they all trying to find a way to get around this and sell direct? That's what Amazon does. When you buy a Kindle edition via the iPad app you're actually just going direct through the browser, not buying through iTunes. I'm assuming Amazon therefore doesn't have to pay Apple a cent on the transaction. Why wouldn't magazine publishers want to do the same, especially on longer-term subscriptions?
Of course, with magazines and newspapers we're talking about publishers who aren't exactly on the cutting edge when it comes to technology solutions. They're still clinging to their print models as much as possible. Why else would I get at least 2-3 "please come back" snail mails from BusinessWeek every month?! So all these magazine/newspaper publishers are probably operating independent of one other, each trying to come up with their own direct sales app/tool. I wonder how much time and money is being wasted because they're not working together on this.
Here's a crazy idea: Maybe they should consider pushing it all through Amazon. If Amazon were smart, they'd pull an end-around on Apple and tell the magazine/newspaper publishers, "hey, sell your subscriptions through us...we won't charge you 30% like Apple...how about 20%, or maybe even 10%?" Amazon already has the infrastructure in place to push content to the iPad as well as a terrific customer service operation, so why shouldn't they leverage their platform for something like this?
One potential pitfall is that Apple might decide it was OK for Amazon to sell their books for the iPad without getting a percentage, but if they're going to be magazine/newspaper distributors for the platform they'll cut off Amazon's iPad access. Let's hope not. After all, if Amazon could take this on, it would create a very healthy competition with Apple, and that would likely be a good thing for consumers.
i totally agreee. Still lugging around the kindle DX on the weekends to read barrons, the economist and business week. im going to try them on zinio to see if that is any better. very frustrating.
Posted by: greg tuorto | June 28, 2010 at 11:29 AM
I totally agree that the magazines must find a more reasonable way to provide their product. You should look at what Wired has done with its 2nd iPad edition. It's progress but not there yet.
Posted by: RickK | June 30, 2010 at 10:06 PM
I agree, too. How strange it would be were RCA and Zenith to require a cut of cable TV subs. At that, they probably would have, had cable been the model in 1948, rather than broadcasting.
Posted by: Michael Banks | June 30, 2010 at 11:49 PM
What are your thoughts on Zinio? They seem to have a business model around subscription sales and cross platform magazine syndication.
Posted by: Tzmartin | July 05, 2010 at 10:12 AM
Tzmartin...funny you should ask about Zinio. I'm about to post a summary of Zinio on my iPadHound blog. It should be up later today. You'll find it at www.ipadhound.com. As a preview to that post, I have to say I have mixed opinions of Zinio. It's OK for some things but not a significant step forward for the magazine business.
Posted by: Joe Wikert | July 06, 2010 at 09:17 AM
My problem with Zinio is the limited selection of technology/computer related content. There used to be larger selection of computer magazines, but somewhere around 2005 or so, the larger volume of support went away. Figuring that it was mostly computer geeks/the technorati that would have devices that made digital magazine reading (in color) interesting, I have never understood the lack of content.
Posted by: Magazine Subscriptions | August 11, 2010 at 01:50 AM