My Photo


  • Loading...

Disclaimer


  • The posts on this weblog are provided “AS IS” with no warranties, and confer no rights. The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.

    © 2013, Joseph B. Wikert
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 02/2005

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

« iBooks Author: Appreciating Apple's Intent | Main | Why TOC NY 2012 Will Be Our Best TOC Ever »

January 30, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452242969e20167614ea629970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Barnes & Noble: It's Time to Disrupt the Industry!:

Comments

Vsandbrook

So, so right! I love that the conversation about B&N has turned so much towards the concept of "disruption". I actually entitled my masters thesis "Surviving a Digital Disruption" because I'd gained such a respect for the term (and the tactic) in my research.

I agree that content providers and distributors need to start thinking about what people want out of their experience (all things you mentioned), not what is necessarily easiest to provide. I think a healthy dose of calculated risk in R&D would be good for publishers, and relying on any one file format, sales model, distributor, or vision of the future only sets the entire industry up for collapse.

Len Feldman

Joe, I agree with you, but we both know that it's not B&N that dictates the use of DRM, it's the publishers. O'Reilly doesn't use DRM, but you're in the minority of publishers. I know a number of distributors and resellers who would drop DRM tomorrow if their publishers allowed them to do so. The case for dropping DRM has to be sold to publishers first. Once that happens, B&N can get a big advantage over Amazon by dropping DRM, since Amazon will most likely keep DRM regardless of whether or not publishers demand it in order to maintain its Kindle lock-in.

Joe Wikert

Hi Len. I wasn't as clear as I should have been in point #1 in the original post. When I suggested there that publishers need to get out of their comfort zones I was implying that they need to abandon DRM. I should have come right out and said that rather than assume everyone would connect point #1 with point #3.

As Charlie Stross said, publishers are cutting their own throats by sticking with DRM. And I agree with you that Amazon would be more likely to hang onto DRM than the other ebook retailers, which would make things very interesting!

Brian O'Leary

For the last several years, Kirk Biglione has been making the argument that Stross picks up here. Kirk presented his arguments at Tools of Change in 2008 and 2010, in what I found to be the single best summary of why publishers should fear DRM.

While I agree that publishers need to adapt, it's not just about getting out of their comfort zones. It's about publishers understanding the reader experience, critically assessing the impact of device-specific DRM on their business models and (finally) separating the use of DRM from discussions of piracy.

I wrote about Kirk's 2010 presentation shortly after he gave it: http://bit.ly/wfUUd0 To me, his work is required reading for anyone who wants to understand the impact of DRM on Amazon's market power.

Newcelona

Hi
We are a digital publisher and we agree that DRM and file format wars are damaging the scenarion in favour of Amazon, but all the actors in the chain are reluctant to leave their comfort zones, not only the publishers, ask the literary agents and the authors themselves!
By the way, why not sell the eBooks directly from the publishers website?
We do, newcelona.com
Cheers!

A Facebook User

I like your position, Joe, it's something that needs to be said - and hopefully publishers will sit up and listen. No question about it, B&N has to bring the fight with Amazon beyond the nuts and bolts of e-readers production and into the e-platform area, i.e. content.

It really is all about content and that's something Amazon seems to have understood long before anyone else.Their platform is by far the most reader/buyer friendly, what with forums, readers reviews, search by keywords, like buttons, best seller lits by endless sorts of categories etc

Here is of course where DRM comes into play. It locks readers into a platform, if I understand this right, and of course Amazon won't abandon it for that reason. B&N has just tactically punched back by refusing to sell in its 750+ stores printed books published by Amazon since Amazon grabbed digital rights to titles that B&N are selling in printed form and not allowing B&N to sell the ebook version.

Add DRM to the mix and it becomes explosive! Publishers need to really think about this and develop their own strategy to reach out to readers (and stop worrying about piracy - with or without DRM it will always exist)...I have no idea how this is going to play out in the end, but it's pretty nasty for us writers, especially newbies on whom publishers don't want to take chances anymore...since they don't seem ready to take chances on themselves either!

Dean

DRM doesn't lock readers into a platform; proprietary DRM locks readers into a platform.

Joe Wikert

Dean, I can't say I agree with you. Give me an example of a DRM that doesn't lock readers into a platform. Adobe might be one answer. If so, I'd argue it locks you into *Adobe's* platform. I'm curious to hear which one you feel doesn't result in some sort of platform lock-in though.

Kelly McClymer

Joe, this is an interesting suggestion. I'm trying to see how it would work. I assume somewhat like what Smashwords allows -- you pick your format after you buy -- only with a more frictionless download directly to the device.

While I think this is something readers would love (buy anywhere for whatever reader you own), I don't see why Amazon wouldn't immediately follow suit if B&N instituted it (which I wish they would). In fact, I'm not sure why Amazon isn't already planning to do this. It dominates the e-reading marketplace at the moment, but that is not likely to last, unless it finds a way to sell books to consumers who are seduced by whatever new ereader strikes their fancy and want to seamlessly and frictionlessly transfer their e-libraries.

Joe Wikert

Kelly, I agree with you that Amazon and others would follow suit if one e-tailer takes the lead on this. That's OK though as it would still lead to a more balanced playing field (everyone selling all formats, no DRM). That's what I'm ultimately after anyway, not trying for one particular retailer to succeed or fail.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.


  • Writer's Digest: 2013 Best Writing Websites (2013)


  • Sell Your Book Like Wildfire

StatCounter