My Photo


  • Loading...

Google Analytics

StatCounter


Disclaimer


  • The posts on this weblog are provided “AS IS” with no warranties, and confer no rights. The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.

    © 2012, Joseph B. Wikert
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 02/2005

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

« Google Editions Should be a Game-Changer | Main | Is the eReader Financial Model Upside Down? »

October 26, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452242969e20120a675d0f8970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference B&N's Nook...and Beyond:

Comments

Kayelle Allen

Thank you for the overview of Nook. As an eBook author with multiple titles, I'm always excited by advances in ways for readers to access my work. The lending feature is a good way to discover new authors, but also denies those authors any royalties. The trade off is the possibility of readers falling in love with characters and series, and buying copies of other eBooks for themselves. Some publishers may disallow the lend feature, just as many disallow printing or read-aloud features on standard PDF files. Whether Nook's lend feature will increase overall sales remains to be seen. Authors of eBooks fight online piracy by teaming up to warn each other when titles are spotted on pirate download sites. No doubt, author fears and hopes will determine publisher decisions as well as public response and eBook sales. Thoughtful article, well written. Thank you for considering Nook's impact on the industry.

Ryan Biggs

Exclusive in-store content may be a good business move for B&N's Nook, but ultimately I think this sort of thing is bad for publishers, authors, and readers. I have the same concern with the music business, where iTunes exlusive releases are a big deal and another reason to buy your digital music player from Apple.

How is it good when an author (or musician) must target different audiences according to what hardware they own? How is it good for consumers when one can no longer simply purchase the best device, but must also consider what exclusive content is available on that device? What if a small upstart company comes out with the best eBook reader device on the planet, built around open standards, so you are not tied to buying content from their store? That should be good for consumers. But it's not, because owning this device means that they no longer have access to any exclusive content.

The music industry, through their inaction and failure to innovate, has basically handed over their entire business to a hardware manufacturer - Apple. I think publishers should be wary of any ebook technology that rises to dominate the market through exclusivity strategies.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.