I got an e-mail the other day from a HarperCollins representative in the U.K. He invited me to take a look at a new service they were about to launch called authonomy. I finally got a chance to review it last night and was very impressed with what I saw.
authonomy is a community site for authors, editors and anyone else interested in the publishing business. If you're an author you could use authonomy to get feedback on your manuscript and increase your visibility. The rules are pretty simple. You need to post a 10,000-word (minimum) portion of your work for review by other authonomy members. As other members read, review and rank your work it gains visibility on the site.
Publishers should love this model because it gives them an opportunity to keep an eye on a large pool of potential up-and-coming authors. HarperCollins obviously has the inside track on this, but any publisher (editor or agent) is free to create their own authonomy profile and join in the fun.
The biggest challenge a service like this will face is in creating a large enough reader/reviewer pool to give it the momentum it needs to succeed. It's sort of like the escape velocity concept in physics; you need a large enough base of participant interest to really take off, and then success seems to snowball. I'm hoping it works though and that it will become a model that can be extended into other segments (hint, hint...computer/technology books).
One final beef: All the content must be read in a browser on a computer screen. Yuck. I know it introduces a whole new level of complexity but it would be wonderful if authonomy would offer other formats and platforms (e.g., PDF, Mobi (for use on Kindles), etc.)







This sounds just like the iPublish model that was launched by Time Warner Books, back in 2001.
Posted by: Vicky Rosenborg | September 04, 2008 at 09:31 AM
Hi Joe,
Clay Sharky was asked to comment on authonomy at BookExpo 08.
http://bookexpocast.com/2008/07/23/upfront-and-unscripted-with-clay-shirky/
at 27:30
He compares it with all the battle-of-the-bands that have been tried and tried in the music industry for years. Clay says it is the right kind of experiment but cautions siding explicitly with the writer (what publishers normally do). Sharky points out that typically the first filter needs to be the harshest -- and the myspace model of recommending talent (a few stages out from the first filter) is likely better.
Starting writers need a network. Authonomy.com fills that need, but as a talent spotting device it will be a hard go.
Best of luck to them.
The rest of the clay sharky podcast is worth your time.
best,
mb
Posted by: Mark Bertils | September 06, 2008 at 02:42 PM