The Importance of Easily Accessible Cover Images
The Sony Reader Experiment at Penn State University

authonomy: One of the Best Ideas I've Heard Lately

AuthonomyI got an e-mail the other day from a HarperCollins representative in the U.K.  He invited me to take a look at a new service they were about to launch called authonomy.  I finally got a chance to review it last night and was very impressed with what I saw.

authonomy is a community site for authors, editors and anyone else interested in the publishing business.  If you're an author you could use authonomy to get feedback on your manuscript and increase your visibility.  The rules are pretty simple.  You need to post a 10,000-word (minimum) portion of your work for review by other authonomy members.  As other members read, review and rank your work it gains visibility on the site.

Publishers should love this model because it gives them an opportunity to keep an eye on a large pool of potential up-and-coming authors.  HarperCollins obviously has the inside track on this, but any publisher (editor or agent) is free to create their own authonomy profile and join in the fun.

The biggest challenge a service like this will face is in creating a large enough reader/reviewer pool to give it the momentum it needs to succeed.  It's sort of like the escape velocity concept in physics; you need a large enough base of participant interest to really take off, and then success seems to snowball.  I'm hoping it works though and that it will become a model that can be extended into other segments (hint, books).

One final beef: All the content must be read in a browser on a computer screen.  Yuck.  I know it introduces a whole new level of complexity but it would be wonderful if authonomy would offer other formats and platforms (e.g., PDF, Mobi (for use on Kindles), etc.)


Vicky Rosenborg

This sounds just like the iPublish model that was launched by Time Warner Books, back in 2001.

Mark Bertils

Hi Joe,

Clay Sharky was asked to comment on authonomy at BookExpo 08.
at 27:30

He compares it with all the battle-of-the-bands that have been tried and tried in the music industry for years. Clay says it is the right kind of experiment but cautions siding explicitly with the writer (what publishers normally do). Sharky points out that typically the first filter needs to be the harshest -- and the myspace model of recommending talent (a few stages out from the first filter) is likely better.

Starting writers need a network. fills that need, but as a talent spotting device it will be a hard go.
Best of luck to them.

The rest of the clay sharky podcast is worth your time.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)