My Photo


  • Loading...

LibraryThing


Google Analytics

StatCounter


Disclaimer


  • The posts on this weblog are provided “AS IS” with no warranties, and confer no rights. The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.

    © 2009, Joseph B. Wikert
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 02/2005

« Mark Cuban on The Future of Computing | Main | The Little Book of Common Sense Investing, by John Bogle »

February 19, 2007

XM + Sirius = ???

Satelliteradio_2They said it couldn't be done.  And frankly, until it passes the DOJ's antitrust review, maybe "they" were (and are still) right...  But for now, XM and Sirius have announced their intention to merge.

Forgive me if I don't sound too enthusiastic about this.  I'm an XM subscriber and I like my existing service just fine, thank you very much.  Why do I get the feeling the new company will charge a higher monthly rate, just because I'll now have the opportunity to listen to Howard Stern?  Geez, that's exactly why I didn't buy a Sirius device to begin with!!!

It will be interesting to see if this one passes federal review.  Both companies have recklessly thrown money around in an attempt to one-up the other and secure more new subscribers.  At least that part of the business model would likely change if they become one...I hope...

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452242969e200d8351b42e069e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference XM + Sirius = ???:

Comments

I am potentially less than thrilled with this news. First, 99.9% of all mergers/acquisitions fail in some form or another; "synergies" are never realized, and something is always lost in the translation. Second, how will the technical details settle out -- they use two different satellite systems, after all. (And will my XM radio become obsolete at some time?) Finally, and most important to me, will the elimination of "duplicate" programming mean the elimination of the well-programmed XM channels that love, such as Soul Street and The Village? Sirius' counterparts are bland hit-oriented playlists, not at all like the unique and genuinely interesting XM channels. This could end up forcing me to install an iPod jack in my car...

I do think the specter of higher monthly service fees and obsolete radios is concerning.

Here's an excerpt from an e-mail message XM sent to all subscribers earlier today:

"...the new company will seek to ensure that in the future, you will be able to access both companies' programming. And, once we are fully integrated, those of you who have factory-installed satellite radio will no longer be limited to the programming provided by the exclusive satellite radio service chosen by their car manufacturer."

The first point is nice and I'm sure it's something they'll make a big deal out of to get this past the FCC. What isn't stated though is what effect this will have on subscription prices. I'd like to have the option of adding some Sirius channels to my XM list, but not if I have to pay any more than my current monthly rate! A cafeteria plan would be nice too, where I could pick and choose all I want from both...but you can bet the cost of that would far exceed the ~$13/month I currently pay for XM!

I'm interested to see how they put both XM and Sirius programming on a single satellite with limited bandwidth. Right now, golden-eared XM subscribers (like me) are complaining about too many channels taking up too much bandwidth, resulting in lower audio quality than what XM had initially. How can you add Sirius channels to the mix without further adversely affecting sound quality? I still say they'll eliminate the dupes -- the similar channels shared between the services. That's what "synergy" and cost efficiencies are all about, right?

I figured they'd need to either remove some of the rarely listened to channels or force you to buy a new device that picks up both signals. In the 8 months or so that I've owned my XM device I can honestly say I've probably tried no more than 30 of the 170+ channels and that I generally only dial into 3-5 different ones over the course of a given week. Maybe I'm in the minority though. My point is that there are probably a lot of channels that almost *nobody* listens to, so why not drop them and add a few of the others from Sirius? But if you're going to charge more, no way...I'm out.

I have had XM for over two years and decided to try Sirius, what a mistake. XM for the most part has no talk on its stations, at Sirius they can't shutup. I would rather listen to MP3 than pay for the same thing I can get for free over the air. I don't believe the merger will see the light of day, but if it does hopefully Sirius wont mess with my XM music. And Joe Wikert, I as you, only listen to about five stations. Danny King.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.


Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    • Books Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory