My Photo


  • Loading...

Disclaimer


  • The posts on this weblog are provided “AS IS” with no warranties, and confer no rights. The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.

    © 2014, Joseph B. Wikert
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 02/2005

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

« Mark Cuban’s The Sport of Business | Main | In Search of the Perfect Computer Book »

March 14, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452242969e200d834760ec869e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Advances and Royalties – The Risk/Reward Decision:

Comments

Bren

Wow, these are great posts, Joe! Thanks for the peek behind the curtain. Fascinating stuff...

Matt Wagner

Hi Joe,

Nice entry. I've done some books with zero advance but with a high flat royalty. Admittedly, that's with authors who have a good existing royalty stream, and are considered name authors, or have a project they strongly believe in.

In principle, it's not a bad idea to exchange advance for royalties when you can afford it, and it can be a great gamble when it pays off -- in more ways than an author might consider, the royalty basis for your first edition may well be used for all subsequent editions, and if you have a hit and you're stuck at 10% forever, consider how much better off you would be if you started at 12%.

On the flip side, and legitimately, many professional authors see the advance as a measure of the publisher's commitment and belief in a book, and a low advance, to them, implies low expectations. If your publisher says we're not going to sell more than 10,000 copies, and the publisher has control of the sales and marketing apparatus, the publisher is not necessarily going to be sending a message that the risk reward equation favors the author at all, so you're relying on the kindness of the author to take the hit here.

I know that advance write-offs are the bane of your existence -- be happy that you're not in the business of publishing those big celebrity bios that sell for millions and then are returned by the millions (Rosanne's, Whoopi's, and Nancy Regan's books apply here).

Frankly, publishers like to delay income to authors. That's one reason publishers hold onto reserves for so long rather than declaring long dead books out of print, or decide to pay royalties on a semi-annual basis, or try to co-account royalties and advances across multiple books.

Some publishers in this space can and do deal with this by treating reserves differently, or by paying royalties on a quarterly or monthly basis, or by investing in great authors with both strong advances and strong royalties and no co-accounting. Authors with a great idea and a great track record always have options.

Another issue you don't touch on is price point. While it may be tough to go above 10% for a book that's priced at $20, the publisher's margin increases greatly at higher price points.

Once an author has a proven royalty stream, an established public, and a very big hit, the importance of the advance diminishes quite a bit, and the reward of a higher royalty is quite tangible indeed. I only wish we had more books in that category.

Joe Wikert

Hi Matt. I hadn’t really thought much about the notion of an advance reflecting the publisher’s commitment level. I guess it’s because I’ve managed a number of zero-advance titles over the years and I don’t think I was any more or less committed to those books than I was committed to the ones with $10K advances or $20K advances, for example. OK, I’m sure I was more committed to ones with advances of well over $20K, but those typically represented the top few titles for the year...and they were going to get extra attention regardless of the advance levels on the other books!

Is it easier for a publisher to cancel a project if they didn’t pay an author advance? Probably. But if that were a concern, would it be possible to incorporate some sort of non-refundable termination fee for the author as some insurance? That would probably serve as a deterrent to make the publisher think twice about canceling, don’t you think? Now, before you try and hit me up for language like this, keep in mind that I’m talking about zero-advance projects. Additionally, I’d have to give some thought to this and figure out what a reasonable termination fee would be…

I’d have to respectfully disagree with you on the comment about better margins on higher priced products. You’re only considering one variable in the equation. The volume variable is often as important, if not more so. If volume is consistent, yes, you’d obviously have better margins on a higher-priced product, but that’s not the case in most situations.

Brad Hill

First comment from me--thank you for your careful and determined work in this blog!

I find your emphasis on the author's belief in the project to be curiously ephemeral. After 10 years and about 25 books (at least half for your companies), it's clear to me that nobody can predict sales of a standard midlist title. Least of all me! I've worked with your top AEs, and everyone seems to be guessing. We are frequently surprised, to the upside and downside. We have collided powerful brands on the cover to no avail in some cases; we have issued questionable titles into smallish markets and earned fat royalty checks.

My belief in a book is irrelevant, and should be viewed that way. I believe in every book during the flush of development, and I assume the same belief on the other side of the table. I would view an AE's offer of lower cash with suspicion--an alarming warning that advance commitment couldn't be raised. If sales are always unpredictable, as I believe they are, then I always attempt to divest as much risk as possible, while assuming as much self-marketing responsibility as possible.

Of course, none of this addresses the generally declining advances and back-end structures since 2000. That's another issue, just as intractable.

I'll read regularly. Many thanks.

Joe Wikert

Hi Brad. Thanks for the comment. I realize everyone's going to interpret an offer of a lower advance and higher royalty rate differently. I can definitely see where this offer might raise author suspicions, but keep in mind: it’s simply a second option. If the author prefers to stick with the higher advance and lower royalty rate they should do so. I just think it’s worthwhile to look at both sides and consider more than one possibility.

Tom Britt

The economics of publishing coupled with the Internet have driven a lot of people to self-publish for these very reasons. Not only do authors sign away their rights for a $10k/10% (which is generous anymore), they also end up doing all the promotion, book signings, and offline work to generate sales. Companies like AuthorHouse and iUniverse are accounting for a large percentage of all books published these days for this very reason. Oh yeah, a lot of authors never get the $10k/10% offer to begin with.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.


  • Writer's Digest: 2013 Best Writing Websites (2013)


  • Sell Your Book Like Wildfire

StatCounter